At first glance Personal CRM seems an oxymoron, or at least terms put together by somebody who doesn’t really understand their meaning. After all, there’s nothing personal about ways companies implement Customer Relationship Management. The systems are intended to enforce control by accountants over sales and service functions.

But distill the concept of CRM to it’s fundamental elements – Relationships, Plans and Schedules – “Who” we know, “What” we want to do them, “When” we plan to do it – the potential for Personal CRM starts to emerge.

Firstly, we really should be keeping our own records of our business contacts, but in a “relationship” as opposed to “transaction” context. The fact that John Jones is CFO of Acme Inc and we have an appointment to discuss his renewal on the 28th is related to a transaction. Facts like he’s a member of Pine Valley Golf Club, enjoys classical music, his wife works for a children’s charity and daughter is studying medicine are related to our relationship.

These are different dimensions of the same contact. We need to be on time with a competitive offer if we’re to win the renewal. At the same time we need to know which of our contacts enjoys concerts when we have tickets for the symphony. If we can commit to knowing more of John’s personal interests we can deepen the relationship, opening up other opportunities. Maintaining that relationship will always be helpful when the going gets tough.

Secondly, we probably don’t need a reminder of our daughter’s birthday, but a reminder to find a gift a few days before might be helpful, as will a list of her close friends so we can invite them to the party.

Thirdly, in the natural course of things we meet people who aren’t, and may never be, clients, and also aren’t family or friends. They can be helpful to us in our business, and we can reciprocate. We need to know what their value add is so we can introduce opportunities to them, and build similar relationships to those with our customers.

We’ve just looked at three different types of relationship, but of course there’s only one of us. Having three different systems to record this information, and know how and when to use it, sounds like it might create more problems than it solves.

Maybe our own Personal CRM system isn’t an oxymoron. Maybe it’s an absolute requirement as the focus of business turns from transactions to relationships

Steve Reeves is Founder and CEO of Front Office Box, the Business 2.0 solution for helping smaller businesses manage plans, tasks, schedules and relationships. His passion is helping them exploit the Internet to increase opportunities and enhance capabilities.

Steve is a 30 year veteran of sales and sales management roles in the B2B space, primarily software, consulting and outsourcing.

Visit Steve’s blog at http://frontofficebox.ning.com

and visit Front Office Box at http://www.frontofficebox.com

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Steven_S_Reeves

  • Share/Bookmark

Without question, the worlds most popular approach to managing relations with customers will be paper based – files, folders, journal books, “stickie” notes.

But when it comes to using computers for CRM, the spreadsheet stands head and shoulders above all the others added together.

Excel, Numbers or Google Spreadsheets are not CRM systems. That doesn’t stop people using them for CRM applications, particularly lists. Lists of customers, targets, suspects, prospects. Lists of deals, sales, values, totals.The same applies to Plans.

There’s no sense to this, given the number of CRM systems around, some of which are free. Why would anybody use technology designed for calculating numbers, and with no integration or process, to manage the multiple dimensions of CRM e.g. Companies, People, Plans, Actions, Schedules, Assignments?

The answer is it’s simple to organize Outlook as a contact and task management system – (not great but can be made to work by somebody with too much time on their hands). This at least sits on the same computer so the spreadsheet lists and contact details are similar places. And of course most people are familiar with the tool set.

The other answer is it’s infinitely flexible. Any user can keep his, or her, information in ways that make sense to them. The tools become genuine enablers, helping, rather than hindering, users to do their jobs better.

Contrast this with typical CRM systems where there are lots of options to choose from, and lots of data to input, for somebody else’s benefit.

One approach is infinitely flexible, although time consuming and sub-optimally efficient. The other is rigid and mostly driven by what other people want.

Ask yourself whether you’d rather spend time finding and winning new business, or fighting somebody else’s idea of what your CRM should work like?

As VP of Sales and Marketing for the UK office of a US based server manufacturer, I ran a team of 50 sales and support people. The guys in Silicon Valley had a “CRM” system they used to collate prospect and forecast information from around the world.

To keep them quiet I had to put my data in their system, but for my own records I used spreadsheets.

Steve Reeves is Founder and CEO of Front Office Box, the Business 2.0 solution for helping smaller businesses manage plans, tasks, schedules and relationships. His passion is helping them exploit the Internet to increase opportunities and enhance capabilities.

Steve is a 30 year veteran of sales and sales management roles in the B2B space, primarily software, consulting and outsourcing.

Visit Front Office Box at http://www.frontofficebox.com

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Steven_S_Reeves

  • Share/Bookmark